WorkINDEX

Wake Work*
2022
Sculpture
Installation
Print
The History of Oppression
2022
Presentation
Illustration
Print
The Liberation Economy
2022
Presentation
Illustration
Bulk Space
2021
Visual Identity
Making Room for Abolition
2021
Installation
Experience
Object(s)
Dark Matters
2021
Facilitation
Escaping Erasure
2020
Teaching
Experience
Enacting Tribute
2019
Object(s)
Video
civic engagement
La Lucha de los Raíces
2018
Facilitation
Research
Experience

Abolition as Process, Art as Methodology

YEAR

March
2023

INTENTION(S)

No items found.

Medium(s)

Facilitation
Object(s)

THEME(s)

abolition
design fiction

Role(s)

FORUM / publication

CLIENT or HOST

CREDITS

Ali Murat Gali

Location

Detroit, MI
Organizers often talk, write, and strategize toward abolition, but rarely do we have a chance to inhabit abolitionist futures in a tangible, experiential way. Building on Making Room for Abolition,“Abolition as Process, Art as Methodology” was a three-hour workshop that gave about 40 Detroit-based organizers time, space and tools to render objects from a world without police and prisons as a means of freedom dreaming and expressing our collective imagination. This workshop was developed for a series held by Ali Gali, Legal Fellow at the Detroit Justice Center and held at We the People’s Detroit offices.

Each of the stunning photos on this page were captured by Na Forest Lim of Radical Play

A tall, brown-skinned Black woman with twists—Lauren Williams—wears a black short-sleeved top, jeans, and a black fanny pack around her torso. Holding papers in her hands, she gestures to participants (not featured) while giving instructions for the workshop. Behind her, two large panels hold instructions and community agreements for the event. 
A wide shot of the room shows participants working in small groups of ~4 people each, many with heads down drawing or writing, others actively talking with each other. A person in a black shirt and brown pants with shoulder length brown hair is in the foreground on the far right side of the image.

Abolition as Process, Art as Methodology builds on Making Room for Abolition, a 2021 installation of a living room that evokes critical conversations around what stands between us and a world without police and prisons. The intention of this wider body of work is to shift culture and practice toward more abolitionist possibilities today by rendering abolition tangible, believable, relatable and real. 

A participant wearing a brown jacket holds a small, light blue card in their right hand. The title reads “Abolition is a practice of living” in blue and offers a definition of abolition in red.
A shot of the activity in the room while about 15 participants wearing face masks are crafting their objects. In the center, a group of six can be seen standing over their shared table, discussing their decisions over materials assembled on their table.

To that end, this work—both the installation and the workshop—focuses on imagining abolitionist worlds through the lens of our home’s most mundane, tangible artifacts: acknowledging how our homes and belongings reflect the world outside and serve as relatable vessels through which we can begin to see glimpses of a radically different future. Home is, for the most part, a relatable realm that makes imagining futures situated at home a little more approachable. This body of work invites us to imagine abolition through home because doing so reflects the fact that carcerality today extends beyond the edifice of the prison or police car and into nearly every system with which we interact, even seeping into our homes. Imagining abolition through the lens of the home allows for multiple entry points to the conversation around abolition, regardless of a person’s experience with the prison industrial complex in its most obvious presentations: imprisonment, policing, surveillance, and more. Carcerality shapes our food systems, the ways we work, how we learn, the media we consume, the values we hold up and those we reject, the people we love and the ways we care for each other. Evidence of these systems are present in every corner of our homes. 

A woman with black hair and black glasses peeks over a tabloid sized sheet of light blue paper that displays a madlib with four brightly colored cards filling in the blanks. It reads: ”It is 2071, and [illegible], in this world, a(n) [blank] might exist in your home’s [living room]. It relates to, reflects, facilitates or evokes [commoning].

This workshop relies on an approach to facilitation adapted from the Situation Lab’s The Thing from the Future, “an imagination game that challenges players to collaboratively and competitively describe objects from a range of alternative futures.” In both games, participants draw cards with central elements of a future scenario—timeframe, the arc of the narrative, the setting, and the intended feeling or experience their object should evoke—before fleshing out the story and imagining an object from that specific context. The intention behind randomizing these elements is to minimize the overwhelmingness of too many choices and allow participants to dive straight into generative conversations, focusing their energy on making more precise decisions within the parameters of the given elements. 

A pair of brown hands wearing an assortment of rings and tattooed forearms adorned with gold bracelets are seen shuffling yellow and pink cards on a table. Glimpses of other workshop materials and group members are visible around the table.

Abolition as Process, Art as Methodology departs from The Thing from the Future in a few crucial ways. Both games involve drawing cards from set categories and imagining future objects based on those randomized inputs. In Abolition as Process, Art as Methodology, the categories were more narrowly crafted to address the specific context of abolition and the setting of home; we also offered a more limited set of possible timeframes, focusing on crafting nearer futures. Over dinner, participants fleshed out the worlds they had inherited and the homes they were inhabiting in this future: exploring where they might be in their lives in this timeframe, questioning how our homes and lives might evolve over time, and making collective decisions about the places and contexts in which their objects would be situated.

Finally, participants selected recycled art materials and transformed them into tangible future objects. Participants were encouraged to focus on letting the process be emergent and to allow materials to inspire new ideas and functionalities.

FILTER

Media

RESET

Year

RESET
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
FILTER